When is a 'fro just a 'fro?..

In the 1960s the Afro became a symbol of the civil rights movement both in the United States, & right here in the UK
A political, and cultural statement
To some ..a symbol of resistance
To this day it's often called.. Afrocentric
Afrocentric.. but it's just hair right?



Black hair has an interesting symbolic history
Styles can often reflect more than just fashion
It can also be an indicator of much more..
An external expression of an internal obsession?
(perhaps... or perhaps I just enjoy a line that rhymes:))



Politically, and historically, just wearing your hair naturally and not battling with the lye(relaxer), was an indication of a people at ease with themselves, and wanting equal rights.. to be treated as equals.. not subhuman under some messed up Jim Crow laws
A recognition that beauty was not under the copyright of white America

Young men in the UK who sported an afro , or grew locks.. gained self respect - but lost jobs...ironically, too long without a job, and that self respect gained could become but a distant memory




Malcolm X's autobiography tells an interesting tale of when he decided to relinquish the 'zoot suits' and 'slicked back hair'
It was a lifestyle change not without substantial cultural and political significance



One which helped to pave a way for the 'freedom of self expression' we enjoy today?
That's if we really do enjoy 'freedom of self expression' today..



As I reflected briefly on the history of hair, one style sprang to mind. It did so because I never see it anymore.. and growing up.. I did..



Is it ever just a 'fro?
Sure.. but it's a 'fro with a rich cultural history and rich tradition..